Our Schools? - Part 2

In a comment to my last post my good friend Dale asked, "do you oppose the mandatory drug testing for teachers who apply for the job to teach our children? I don't see where that is different..." This is an excellent question and deserves consideration. Take a look at his comment. He makes some very good points.

I think drug testing for school teachers is a good idea. I actually think it is a good idea for day-care workers and anyone else who will be working closely with young people. The key is that when they apply for the job it is their choice. There is no government law forcing them to take that job. If the job requires anything they do not like they do not have to apply for the job.

Children are required by law to attend school. This law is enforceable by the police at gun-point if necessary (I am being extreme to make the point). Sure they can home-school or go to a private school but the vast majority of our children go to public school. For many families public school is the only practical option.

The reason the fourth amendment was added was to guarantee the government will not violate our rights as individuals. I am concerned about the precedent that is being set here. If the government is allowed to drug test children without probable cause what is to stop them from changing the test to something we do not agree with? What if they decide to psychologically test our children to make sure they are appropriately tolerant of the h*mos*xual lifestyle?

"That would never happen!" you say? Check out this excerpt from the Family Research Council:

[Isaiah Washington] checked into an inpatient treatment facility to "undergo intensive counseling about his anti-g[*]y feelings." In America, this liberal brainwashing could easily become a norm should the first step of passing radical "hate crimes" legislation be approved by Congress.

Now this is liberal Hollywood but there is a strong national agenda for this type of action. They would love for there to be tolerance education and random testing of our children. If they fail the test they can continue in their extracurricular activities if they agree to go to intensive counseling.

Shouldn't the fourth amendment protect us from this type of action? While drugs are a huge problem and random testing could help curb this problem, I feel it opens a door for government intrusion into our lives.

Well this should be my last rant on this soap-box. While I do feel strongly about this as a constitutional issue, the constitution is not Scripture. Psalm 115:3 says, "Our God is in the heavens, and he does as he wishes." There are many times God uses nations (governments) to bring correction to His people. Our duty is to pray that God will grant His wisdom to the School Board and those around them. Amen!

Our Schools?

Today was the School Board meeting where they allowed the public to express ideas on two issues: random drug testing and abstinence based health education.

First off, I am 100% in support of teaching abstinence in our schools. In fact there were no individuals that spoke in opposition of it. And there was some very lively argument. This, of course, does not mean that the school board will implement it but hopefully it is a step in the right direction.

As for random drug testing, I do not think it is the right thing to do in our public schools. There is no denying that drugs are a major problem but having this problem does not make this "solution" right. I am not going to write all day on this but I want to give a brief defense of my position. -- BTW I spoke out against it at the meeting and was very inarticulate :-(. Most of my points were well presented by another gentleman, so I felt okay after feeling like I had bombed.

Basically I oppose random drug testing because I feel it violates the rights we are guaranteed by this:

The Fourth Amendment to the United Stated Constitution

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and
effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and
no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or
affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the
persons or things to be seized.

If the school can produce "probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized" and a Warrant issued by a judge, then I think they can drug test. If not, then they may not.

Think about it this way, would you want random drug tests to extend to anyone in the city? How about random searches of the closets in anyone's house to check for drug paraphernalia? I think that most would say those infringe on our rights "to be secure in [our] persons, houses, papers, and effects". How then can we say that drug testing, without "probable cause" is okay?

According to the Supreme Court random drug testing is permissible for any student involved in any extracurricular activity or who has a personal parking permit. To this I would say that the Supreme Court is wrong. They have made other decisions that I also think are flat out wrong (you can probably guess what I am referring to). If our Legislature or Executive would rise up and challenge the Court this decision could be reversed. Also, why then is it not permissible for all students? Do you have more rights if you do not participate in anything?

I know we need to find a way to restrain drug use in our schools but I do not think that trampling on constitutional rights is the way to go.

SNOW

Well, this morning we have about a foot of snow and drifts of three to four feet all around the house. I will be working from home today. :-)

It is even colder!

In an earlier post I showed you a picture of the ice stalagmite that had formed under the exaust drain from our furnace. Here is that pic and a few more I have taken over the last few days.

Sunday, February 4th



Thursday night, February 8th



Today, Tuesday, February 13th

Havin' fun at work

Yesterday I had a big meeting to present my proposals for a complete revamping of our main software application. I have been supporting the legacy app for the last three years and now I have the opportunity to implement some major overhauls. I was somewhat nervous because I halfway expected to be told to not take such a large bite. But the presentation went well and my boss and the rest of the team agreed with my design and I have been given approval to move forward. Now I am really excited about my job for the next six months or so. I admit I am a geek! :-)

Thank You God for Your favor!!!

My... how things change

I grew up in a nice sized AG church in Santa Fe, NM. I heard some really good teaching on prophecy and the end times and I loved it all. I have always been fascinated with all the weirdness in the book of Revelation and Daniel. But I was given and accepted the idea that these prophecies were all for the distant future.

Over the last 15 years or so I have been introduced to some different thinking on these matters. For Christmas this year I got a 21 CD teaching set from Gary Demar and American Vision. I finished listening to those a couple of weeks back. Over the last few days I have gone through Revelation and Daniel again. In fact on my drive to and from work this week I listened to Revelation once, Malachi once and Daniel four times.

I really focused on Daniel because all the strange imagery intrigued me and I think I see a pattern in the prophetic visions that Daniel has. It seems to me that the four visions in Daniel all speak of the same events in history and they all point to Christ's first coming and the destruction of Jerusalem.

The four visions are as follows:

1. Nebuchadnezzar's dream about the statue (Daniel 2)
2. Daniel's vision of four beasts (Daniel 7)
3. Daniel's vision of a ram and a goat (Daniel 8)
4. Daniel's vision of a man (Daniel 10-12)

I see in chapter 2 where Nebuchadnezzar has the dream of the statue, the statue has five parts that represent four kingdoms, a gold head, silver chest and arms, belly and thighs of bronze, and its legs were iron. There were also feet and toes made of a mixture of iron and clay. At the end of verse 38 Daniel tells Nebuchadnezzar, "You are the head of gold," so we know the first of these kingdoms is Babylon. So then the silver represents the Medes and Persians. The bronze represents the Greek empire, and the iron represents the Roman empire. The feet of clay and iron represent the mixture of Greek and Roman empires. It specifically mentions the toes which may be this fourth kingdom splitting under ten kings.

In chapter 7 it explains that the four beasts represent, again, four kingdoms and then ten kingdoms come from the fourth kingdom.

In chapter 8 it explains that the the two-horned ram is the kingdom of Media and Persia. The one horned goat is the kingdom of Greece.

In chapter 11 it again talks of the kings of Persia and Greece.

Can you see how I think there is a pattern in these? Much of the language and situations between the different visions is similar and it almost seems like he is getting a little more detail for the same events with each vision.

The other idea that helps me think in this direction is that the phrases that deal with "the end" or "the end of time" are speaking of the end of the old covenant and not the end of history. The visions were prophetic for Daniel and spoke of future events from his time but they are historical events from my time.

I do not understand it all yet and I can surely be wrong on some of it but this view of Daniel sure makes a lot more sense to me than what I grew up with. Let me know your thoughts and if you can recommend any resources (especially audio) :-).

It is cold!

Yesterday and today it has been in the single digits here. This morning when I got up it was -1. Brrrr! When we left for church we noticied that a stalagmite had formed beside our house. I took this picture when we got home. The pipe in the wall is the exaust vent from our new furnace. It has been running quite a bit the last few days.

HEY!!! (from downstairs)

OK, so I am upstairs, blogging of course, when from downstairs I hear HEY!!! Abby is tucked into a blanket on the couch watching the Velveteen Rabbit. She hates to get up from this spot so if she needs anything she yells for mommy or me.

I go downstairs to see what her-majesty needs, and what do I find? A tiny, three-year-old finger pointing up at me with a great big booger on the end of it. I guess she found it in her nose while watching her video. I got a tissue for her and all was right again in Abby's kingdom.

Fancy

My wife (shaggabear) and Abby have spent the last several days making Abby's room Fancy! It has a lot to do with beads and feathers and flowers and ribbons. Not my cup of tea. I got to help out with installing curtain harware and hooks to hang things on. I also replaced the door nob with a more fancy glass one that shaggabear picked up at a garage sale.

Anyway, after they got it all done today I must say it is really pretty. Abby has brought a lot of fun into our house. I am sure shaggabear will have all the fancy pictures on here blog soon for you to check out.

What is the kingdom of God to you?

In Matthew 13 Jesus gives several example stories of what the Kingdom of God is like. Verses 44-46 say,

44"The kingdom of heaven is like treasure hidden in a field. When a man found it, he hid it again, and then in his joy went and sold all he had and bought that field.

45"Again, the kingdom of heaven is like a merchant looking for fine pearls. 46When he found one of great value, he went away and sold everything he had and bought it.

The reality of the kingdom of Good is often hidden from us. I know it has great value but I am just not exactly sure how to bring the Kingdom near. These verses talk of selling all I have to buy It. Am I willing to do that? What does that mean?

But it is also more than just an individual thing. It has to do with the whole of creation. Christ is sitting at the right hand of God waiting for his enemies to be made his footstool. (PS 110:1, Luke 20:43, Acts 2:35, Heb. 10:13) Matt. 11:12 says "the kingdom of heaven has been forcefully advancing, and forceful men lay hold of it." That definitely speaks of more than just the individual submitting to the kingdom.

Back to Matthew 13. Jesus gives another picture of the kingdom right after the treasure in a field and the pearl of great value. Verses 47-50 say,

47"Once again, the kingdom of heaven is like a net that was let down into the lake and caught all kinds of fish. 48When it was full, the fishermen pulled it up on the shore. Then they sat down and collected the good fish in baskets, but threw the bad away. 49This is how it will be at the end of the age. The angels will come and separate the wicked from the righteous 50and throw them into the fiery furnace, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.

The picture given here is not a personal one but one of all humanity being separated between wicked and righteous. I have been meditating on the kingdom of God for a week or so. So many thoughts and not enough time to blog!!!